Package 'baldur'

Description

baldur is a Bayesian hierarchical model for statistical decision in proteomics data. It models the mean-variance trend with the option of two different regression models, a gamma regression or a latent gamma mixture regression. It then the regression model as en Empirical Bayes estimator for the prior on the variance. Further, it assumes that each measurement has an uncertainty (increased variance) associated with it that it also infers. Finally, it tries to estimate the posterior distribution (by Hamiltonian Monte Carlo) for the differences in means for each peptide in the data. Once the posterior is inferred, it integrates the tails to estimate the probability of error from which a statistical decision can be made.

Author(s)

Maintainer: Philip Berg [email protected] (ORCID)

References

Berg George Popescu (2023) "Baldur: Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Label-Free Proteomics with Gamma Regressing Mean-Variance Trends" Molecular & Cellular Proteomics: 2023-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100658

Stan Development Team (2022). RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.21.5. https://mc-stan.org

See Also

Useful links:

• https://github.com/PhilipBerg/baldur

• Report bugs at https://github.com/PhilipBerg/baldur/issues

Description

Calculates the mean and standard deviation of each row (peptide) and adds them as new columns. Assumes that the condition names are the names in the design matrix.

Usage

calculate_mean_sd_trends(data, design_matrix, auxiliary_columns = c())

Arguments

Value

A tibble or data.frame with the mean and sd vectors

Examples

# Setup model matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

yeast %>%
    # Normalize data
    psrn("identifier") %>%
    # Get mean-variance trends
    calculate_mean_sd_trends(design)

Description

Here we assume that the sample mean of each condition is an estimator for the center of the mean prior. In addition, it assumes that the confidence in the prior is proportional to the variance of the peptide.

$\boldsymbol{\mu}_0\sim\mathcal{N}(\boldsymbol{\bar{y}},\sigma\boldsymbol{n}_R)$

$\boldsymbol{n}_R=[\frac{1}{\sqrt{n_1}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{n_2}},\dots,\frac{1}{\sqrt{n_C}}]$

Value

A stanmodel that can be used in infer_data_and_decision_model.

Code

The Stan code for this model is given by:

empirical_bayes
S4 class stanmodel 'empirical_bayes' coded as follows:
data {
  int<lower=0> N;     // number of data items
  int<lower=0> K;     // number of conditions
  int C;              // number of comparisons to perform
  matrix[N, K] x;     // design matrix
  vector[N] y;        // data
  matrix[K, C] c;     // contrast matrix
  real alpha;         // alpha prior for gamma
  real beta;          // beta prior for gamma
  vector[N] u;        // uncertainty
  vector[K] mu_not;   // prior mu
}
transformed data{
  vector[K] n_k;      // per condition reciprocal measurements
  row_vector[C] n_c;  // per comparison measurements
  matrix[K, C] abs_c; // abs of C for n_c calculation
  for (i in 1:K) {
    for (j in 1:C) {
      abs_c[i, j] = abs(c[i, j]);
    }
  }
  for (i in 1:K) {
    n_k[i] = 1/sum(x[,i]);
  }
  n_c = n_k' * abs_c;
  n_c = sqrt(n_c);
  n_k = sqrt(2*n_k);
}
parameters {
  vector[K] mu;           // mean vector
  real<lower=0> sigma;    // error scale
  array[C] real y_diff;   // difference in coefficients
  vector[K] eta;          // Error in mean
  vector[K] prior_mu_not; // Estimation error
}
transformed parameters{
  row_vector[C] mu_diff = mu' * c;      // differences in means
  vector[K] sigma_mu_not = sigma * n_k; // variance of ybars
  vector[C] sigma_lfc = sigma * n_c';   // variance of y_diff
}
model {
  sigma        ~ gamma(alpha, beta);                        // variance
  eta          ~ normal(0, 1);                              // NCP auxilary variable
  prior_mu_not ~ normal(mu_not, sigma_mu_not);              // Prior mean
  mu           ~ normal(prior_mu_not + sigma * eta, sigma); // mean
  y            ~ normal(x * mu, sigma * u);                 // data model
  y_diff       ~ normal(mu_diff, sigma_lfc);                // difference statistic
} 

Description

Estimates the hyperparameters for the Bayesian data and decision model. estimate_gamma_hyperparameters is a wrapper that adds new columns to the data (one for alpha and one for betas). Note that for lgmr objects, the estimate_beta function assumes that the data is ordered as when the model was fitted. If this is not the case, theta's will be incorrectly matched with peptides—resulting in wrong estimates of beta parameters. On the other hand, estimate_gamma_hyperparameters will temporarily sort the data as when fitted and the sort it back as it was input to the function.

Usage

estimate_gamma_hyperparameters(reg, data, ...)

## S3 method for class 'glm'
estimate_gamma_hyperparameters(reg, data, ...)

## S3 method for class 'lgmr'
estimate_gamma_hyperparameters(reg, data, id_col, ...)

estimate_beta(reg, mean, ...)

## S3 method for class 'glm'
estimate_beta(reg, mean, alpha, ...)

## S3 method for class 'lgmr'
estimate_beta(reg, mean, m, s, ...)

Arguments

Value

estimate_gamma_hyperparameters returns a tibble or data.frame with the alpha,beta hyperparameters estimates as new columns.

estimate_beta returns estimates of the beta parameter(s)

Examples

# Setup model matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

# Normalize data
yeast_norm <- yeast %>%
    psrn("identifier") %>%
    # Get mean-variance trends
    calculate_mean_sd_trends(design)

# Fit gamma regression (could also have been a lgmr model)
gam_reg <- fit_gamma_regression(yeast_norm, sd ~ mean)

# Estimate priors
gam_reg %>%
    estimate_gamma_hyperparameters(yeast_norm)

# Can also explicitly estimate the beta parameters
# Note this is order sensitive.
estimate_beta(gam_reg, yeast_norm$mean, 1/summary(gam_reg)$dispersion)

Description

Estimates the measurement uncertainty for each data point using a Gamma regression. Calculated as the expected standard deviation for each measurement:

$\text{E}[s_i|\omega,y_{ij}]=\exp({f(y_{ij},\omega)})$

where $\omega$ are the regression parameters and $f$ is a function describing the mean relationship between $s_i$ and $y_{ij}$.

Usage

estimate_uncertainty(reg, data, id_col, design_matrix)

## S3 method for class 'glm'
estimate_uncertainty(reg, data, id_col, design_matrix)

## S3 method for class 'lgmr'
estimate_uncertainty(reg, data, id_col, design_matrix)

Arguments

Value

A matrix with the uncertainty

Examples

# Setup model matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

yeast_norm <- yeast %>%
  # Remove missing data
  tidyr::drop_na() %>%
  # Normalize data
  psrn("identifier") %>%
  # Add mean-variance trends
  calculate_mean_sd_trends(design)
# Fit the gamma regression
gam <- fit_gamma_regression(yeast_norm, sd ~ mean)
# Estimate each data point's uncertainty
estimate_uncertainty(gam, yeast_norm, 'identifier', design)

Description

fit_gamma_regression returns a glm object containing the gamma regression for the mean-variance trend.

Usage

fit_gamma_regression(data, formula = sd ~ mean, ...)

Arguments

Value

fit_gamma_regression returns a glm object

Examples

# Generate a design matrix for the data
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))

# Set correct colnames, this is important for calculate_mean_sd_trends
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

# Normalize and log-transform the data
yeast_norm <- psrn(yeast, "identifier") %>%
  # Add row means and variances
  calculate_mean_sd_trends(design)

# Fit gamma regression model for the mean-variance trends
gamma_model <- fit_gamma_regression(yeast_norm, sd ~ mean)

Description

See lgmr_model for model details.

Usage

fit_lgmr(
  data,
  id_col,
  model = lgmr_model,
  iter = 6000,
  warmup = 1500,
  chains = 5,
  cores = 1,
  return_stanfit = FALSE,
  simplify = FALSE,
  ...
)

## S3 method for class 'lgmr'
print(
  x,
  simplify = x$simplify,
  pars = c("auxiliary", "coefficients"),
  digits = 3,
  ...
)

## S3 method for class 'lgmr'
coef(object, simplify = FALSE, pars = c("coefficients", "auxiliary"), ...)

Arguments

Value

A fitted lgmr model.

Examples

# Define design matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))


# Normalize data, calculate M-V trend, and fit LGMR model
yeast_lgmr <- yeast %>%
    # Remove missing values
    tidyr::drop_na() %>%
    # Normalize
    psrn("identifier") %>%
    # Add the mean-variance trends
    calculate_mean_sd_trends(design) %>%
    # Fit the model
    fit_lgmr("identifier")
# Print everything except thetas
print(yeast_lgmr, pars = c("coefficients", "auxiliary"))
# Extract the mean of the model parameters posterior
yeast_lgmr_pars <- coef(yeast_lgmr, pars = 'all', simplify = TRUE)

Description

Function to sample the posterior of the Bayesian data and decision model. It first produces the needed inputs for Stan's sampling() for each peptide (or protein, PTM, etc.). It then runs the sampling for the data and decision model. From the posterior, it then collects estimates and sampling statistics from the posterior of data model and integrates the decision distribution D. It then returns a tibble() with all the information for each peptide's posterior (see Value below). There are major time gains to be made by running this procedure in parallel. infer_data_and_decision_model has an efficient wrapper around multidplyr. This will let you to evenly distribute all peptides evenly to each worker. E.g., two workers will each run half of the peptides in parallel.

Usage

infer_data_and_decision_model(
  data,
  id_col,
  design_matrix,
  contrast_matrix,
  uncertainty_matrix,
  stan_model = empirical_bayes,
  clusters = 1,
  h_not = 0,
  auxiliary_columns = c(),
  ...
)

Arguments

Details

The data model of Baldur assumes that the observations of a peptide, $\boldsymbol{Y}$, is a normally distributed with a standard deviation, $\sigma$, common to all measurements. In addition, it assumes that each measurement has a unique uncertainty $u$. It then models all measurements in the same condition with a common mean $\mu$. It then assumes that the common variation of the peptide is caused by the variation in the $\mu$ As such, it models $\mu$ with the common variance $\sigma$ and a non-centered parametrization for condition level effects.

$\boldsymbol{Y}\sim\mathcal{N}(\boldsymbol{X}\boldsymbol{\mu},\sigma\boldsymbol{u})\quad \boldsymbol{\mu}\sim\mathcal{N}(\mu_0+\boldsymbol{\eta}\sigma,\sigma)$

It then assumes $\sigma$ to be gamma distributed with hyperparameters infered from either a gamma regression fit_gamma_regression or a latent gamma mixture regression fit_lgmr.

$\sigma\sim\Gamma(\alpha,\beta)$

For details on the two priors for $\mu_0$ see empirical_bayes or weakly_informative. Baldur then builds a posterior distribution of the difference(s) in means for contrasts of interest. In addition, Baldur increases the precision of the decision as the number of measurements increase. This is done by weighting the sample size with the contrast matrix. To this end, Baldur limits the possible contrast of interest such that each column must sum to zero, and the absolute value of each column must sum to two. That is, only mean comparisons are allowed.

$\boldsymbol{D}\sim\mathcal{N}(\boldsymbol{\mu}^\text{T}\boldsymbol{K},\sigma\boldsymbol{\xi}),\quad \xi_{i}=\sqrt{\sum_{c=1}^{C}|k_{cm}|n_c^{-1}}$

where $\boldsymbol{K}$ is a contrast matrix of interest and $k_{cm}$ is the contrast of the c:th condition in the m:th contrast of interest, and $n_c$ is the number of measurements in the c:th condition. Baldur then integrates the tails of $\boldsymbol{D}$ to determine the probability of error.

$P(\text{\textbf{error}})=2\Phi(-\left|\boldsymbol{\mu}_{\boldsymbol{D}}-H_0\right|\odot\boldsymbol{\tau}_{\boldsymbol{D}})$

where $H_0$ is the null hypothesis for the difference in means, $\Phi$ is the CDF of the standard normal, $\boldsymbol{\mu}_{\boldsymbol{D}}$ is the posterior mean of $\boldsymbol{D}$, $\boldsymbol{\tau}_{\boldsymbol{D}}$ is the posterior precision of $\boldsymbol{D}$, and $\odot$ is the Hadamard product.

Value

A tibble() or data.frame() annotated with statistics of the posterior and p(error). err is the probability of error, i.e., the two tail-density supporting the null-hypothesis, lfc is the estimated $\log_2$-fold change, sigma is the common variance, and lp is the log-posterior. Columns without suffix shows the mean estimate from the posterior, while the suffixes ⁠_025⁠, ⁠_50⁠, and ⁠_975⁠, are the 2.5, 50.0, and 97.5, percentiles, respectively. The suffixes ⁠_eff⁠ and ⁠_rhat⁠ are the diagnostic variables returned by Stan. In general, a larger ⁠_eff⁠ indicates effective sample size and ⁠_rhat⁠ indicates the mixing within chains and between the chains and should be smaller than 1.05 (please see the Stan manual for more details). In addition it returns a column warnings with potential warnings given by the sampler.

Examples

# (Please see the vignette for a tutorial)
# Setup model matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

yeast_norm <- yeast %>%
# Remove missing data
  tidyr::drop_na() %>%
  # Normalize data
  psrn('identifier') %>%
  # Add mean-variance trends
  calculate_mean_sd_trends(design)

# Fit the gamma regression
gam <- fit_gamma_regression(yeast_norm, sd ~ mean)

# Estimate each data point's uncertainty
unc <- estimate_uncertainty(gam, yeast_norm, 'identifier', design)

yeast_norm <- gam %>%
   # Add hyper-priors for sigma
   estimate_gamma_hyperparameters(yeast_norm)
# Setup contrast matrix
contrast <- matrix(c(-1, 1), 2)

yeast_norm %>%
  head() %>% # Just running a few for the example
  infer_data_and_decision_model(
    'identifier',
    design,
    contrast,
    unc,
    clusters = 1 # I highly recommend increasing the number of parallel workers/clusters
                 # this will greatly reduce the time of running baldur
  )

Description

Baldur has the option to use the Latent Gamma Regression Model (LGMR). This model attempts to estimate local Mean-Variance (M-V) trend for each peptide (or protein, PTM, etc.). To this end is describes the M-V trend as a regression with a common link function and a latent one. While there may not be a latent trend in real data, it allows for a mathematical description that can estimate the local trends of each peptide. The model describes the standard deviation (S) as a gamma random variable with mean dependency described by the sample mean ($\bar{y}$):

$\boldsymbol{S}\sim\Gamma(\alpha,\beta),\quad\boldsymbol{\beta}=\frac{\alpha}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}$

$\boldsymbol{\mu}=\exp(\gamma_0-\gamma_{\bar{y}}\,f(\boldsymbol{\bar{y}})) + \kappa \exp(\boldsymbol{\theta}(\gamma_{0L}-\gamma_{\bar{y}L}\,f(\boldsymbol{\bar{y}})),\quad f(\boldsymbol{x})=\frac{\boldsymbol{x}-\mu_{\bar{y}}}{\sigma_{\bar{y}}}$

Here, $\exp(\gamma_0-\gamma_{\bar{y}}f(\boldsymbol{\bar{y}}))$ is the common trend of the regression. Then, the mixing variable, $\boldsymbol{\theta}$, describes the proportion of the mixture that each peptide has, and $\kappa$ is just some small constant such that when $\theta$ is zero the latent term is small.

Details

Next we will describe the hierarchical prior setup for the regression variables. For $\alpha$ baldur uses a half-Cauchy as a weakly informative prior:

$\alpha\sim\text{Half-Cauchy}(25)$

For the latent contribution to the i:th peptide, $\theta_i$, has an uniform distribution:

$\theta_i\sim\mathcal{U}(0, 1)$

Further, it can be seen that Baldur assumes that S always decreases (on average) with the sample mean. To this end, both slopes ($\gamma_{\bar{y}},\gamma_{\bar{y}L}$) are defined on the real positive line. Hence, we used Half-Normal (HN) distributions to describe the slope parameters:

$\gamma_{\bar{y}}\sim HN(1)$

$\gamma_{\bar{y}L}\sim HN(1)$

For the intercepts, we assume a standard normal prior for the common intercept. Then, we use a skew-normal to model the latent intercept. The reason for this is two-fold, one, $\kappa$ will decrease the value of the latent term and, two, to push the latent trend upwards. The latter reason is so that the latent intercept is larger than the common and so that the priors prioritize a shift in intercept over a increase in slope. For the intercepts, Baldur uses a standard normal prior for the common intercept.

$\gamma_0\sim\mathcal{N}(0,1)$

While for the latent trend, it uses a skew-normal (SN) to push up the second trend and to counteract the shrinkage of $\kappa$.

$\gamma_{0L}\sim\mathcal{SN}(2,15,35)$

Value

A stanmodel that can be used in fit_lgmr.

Code

The Stan code for this model is given by:

lgmr_model
S4 class stanmodel 'lgmr_model' coded as follows:
functions {
  // mu
  vector reg_function(
    vector x,
    vector theta,
    real I,
    real I_L,
    real S,
    real S_L,
    int N
    ) {
    vector[N] exp_beta  = .001*exp(theta .* (I_L - S_L*x));
              exp_beta +=      exp(I - S*x);
    return exp_beta;
  }
}
data {
  int<lower=0> N;       // Number of observations
  vector<lower=0>[N] y; // sd
  vector[N] x;          // mean
}
transformed data {
  real v_y = variance(y);                      // for NRMSE
  vector[N] x_star = (x - mean(x))/sd(x);      // f(y_bar)
  vector[3] lb = [0, 0, negative_infinity()]'; // Boundaries normal coefs.
}
parameters {
  real<lower = 0> alpha;                 // Shape
  vector<lower = lb>[3] eta;             // For S, S_L, I
  vector<lower = 0, upper = 1>[N] theta; // Mixture parameter
  real I_L;                              // Intercept Latent
}
transformed parameters {
  real<lower = 0> S   = eta[1]; // Slope common
  real<lower = 0> S_L = eta[2]; // Slope Latent
  real I              = eta[3]; // Intercep common
}
model {
  //Priors
  alpha         ~ cauchy(0, 25);
  eta           ~ std_normal();
  I_L           ~ skew_normal(2, 15,  35);
  theta         ~ beta(1, 1);
  {
    vector[N] exp_beta = reg_function(x_star, theta, I, I_L, S, S_L, N);
    // Likelihood
    y ~ gamma(alpha, alpha ./ exp_beta);
  }
}
generated quantities {
  // NRMSE calculations
  real nrmse;
  {
    vector[N] se = reg_function(x_star, theta, I, I_L, S, S_L, N);
    se -= y;
    se  = square(se);
    nrmse = mean(se) / v_y;
  }
  nrmse = sqrt(nrmse);
} 

Description

Options to plot the LGMR model. plot_lgmr_regression will plot the data colored by the amount of latent trend they have as well as the two extreme regression cases when $\theta$ is zero or one. plot_regression_field will plot the local regression trend for each data point as a vector field and color the vector based on the derivative at the mean of the peptide.

Usage

plot_lgmr_regression(model)

plot_regression_field(model, n = 10, rng = 10)

Arguments

Value

A ggplot object

Examples

#' # Define design matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))


# Normalize data, calculate M-V trend, and fit LGMR model
yeast_lgmr <- yeast %>%
    # Remove missing values
    tidyr::drop_na() %>%
    # Normalize
    psrn("identifier") %>%
    # Add the mean-variance trends
    calculate_mean_sd_trends(design) %>%
    # Fit the model
    fit_lgmr("identifier")
# Print everything except thetas
print(yeast_lgmr, pars = c("coefficients", "auxiliary"))
# Extract the mean of the model parameters posterior
yeast_lgmr_pars <- coef(yeast_lgmr, pars = 'all', simplify = TRUE)
plot_lgmr_regression(yeast_lgmr)
plot_regression_field(yeast_lgmr)

Description

Generates a scatter plot with the gamma regressions of the mean-variance trends without partitioning

Usage

plot_gamma(data)

Arguments

Value

a plot with the estimated mean-variance trend

Examples

# Produce a design matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

# Normalize and log transform the data
yeast_norm <- psrn(yeast, "identifier")

# Generate the plot
yeast_norm %>%
  calculate_mean_sd_trends(design) %>%
  plot_gamma()

Description

Generates a scatter plot with the gamma regressions of the mean-variance trend. Can either be ran directly with plot_gamma_regression and inputing a design matrix, or with plot_gamma if the M-V trend has been added to the data with calculate_mean_sd_trends().

Usage

plot_gamma_regression(data, design)

Arguments

Value

a plot with the mean-variance trend before partitioning on the left side, and the right side after.

Examples

# Produce a design matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

# Normalize and log transform the data
yeast %>%
    # Remove missing data
    # Note that this could be replaced with imputation
    tidyr::drop_na() %>%
    # Normalize
    psrn("identifier") %>%
    plot_gamma_regression(design)

Description

plot_sa returns a ggplot with a graphical representation between the log fold-change and sigma.

Usage

plot_sa(results, alpha = 0.05, lfc = NULL)

Arguments

Value

plot_sa returns a ggplot object

Examples

# Setup model matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

yeast_norm <- yeast %>%
# Remove missing data
  tidyr::drop_na() %>%
  # Normalize data
  psrn('identifier') %>%
  # Add mean-variance trends
  calculate_mean_sd_trends(design)
# Fit the gamma regression
gam <- fit_gamma_regression(yeast_norm, sd ~ mean)
# Estimate each data point's uncertainty
unc <- estimate_uncertainty(gam, yeast_norm, "identifier", design)
yeast_norm <- gam %>%
   # Add hyper-priors for sigma
   estimate_gamma_hyperparameters(yeast_norm)
# Setup contrast matrix
contrast <- matrix(c(-1, 1), 2)

results <- yeast_norm %>%
  head() %>% # Just run a few for the example
  infer_data_and_decision_model(
    'identifier',
    design,
    contrast,
    unc,
    clusters = 1 # I highly recommend increasing the number of parallel workers/clusters
                 # this will greatly reduce the speed of running baldur
  )
  # Plot with alpha = 0.05
  plot_sa(results, alpha = 0.05)
  # Plot with alpha = 0.01 and show LFC = 1
  plot_sa(results, alpha = 0.01, 1)

Description

plot_volcano returns a ggplot with a graphical representation between the -log10(err) and LFC.

Usage

plot_volcano(results, alpha = 0.05, lfc = NULL)

Arguments

Value

plot_volcano returns a ggplot object

Examples

# Setup model matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + factor(rep(1:2, each = 3)))
colnames(design) <- paste0("ng", c(50, 100))

yeast_norm <- yeast %>%
# Remove missing data
  tidyr::drop_na() %>%
  # Normalize data
  psrn('identifier') %>%
  # Add mean-variance trends
  calculate_mean_sd_trends(design)
# Fit the gamma regression
gam <- fit_gamma_regression(yeast_norm, sd ~ mean)
# Estimate each data point's uncertainty
unc <- estimate_uncertainty(gam, yeast_norm, 'identifier', design)
yeast_norm <- gam %>%
   # Add hyper-priors for sigma
   estimate_gamma_hyperparameters(yeast_norm)
# Setup contrast matrix
contrast <- matrix(c(-1, 1), 2)

results <- yeast_norm %>%
  head() %>% # Just run a few for the example
  infer_data_and_decision_model(
    'identifier',
    design,
    contrast,
    unc,
    clusters = 1 # I highly recommend increasing the number of parallel workers/clusters
                 # this will greatly reduce the speed of running baldur
  )
  # Plot indicating where alpha = 0.05
  plot_volcano(results, alpha = 0.05)
  # Plot indicating where alpha = 0.01 and where LFC = 1
  plot_volcano(results, alpha = 0.01, 1)

Description

This function generates a pseudo-reference by taking the geometric mean of each peptide across all samples. Each peptide in each sample is then divided by the pseudo-reference. Then, the median ratio of all ratios is used as an estimate to use for normalizing differences in loading concentration. All features in each sample is then divided by their corresponding estimate. All estimates are based on features without missing values. For details see Anders and Huber (2010).

Usage

psrn(data, id_col, log = TRUE, load_info = FALSE, target = NULL)

Arguments

Value

data frame with normalized values if load_info=FALSE, if it is TRUE then it returns a list with two tibbles. One tibble containing the normalized data and one containing the loading info as well as the estimated normalization factors.

Source

https://www.nature.com/articles/npre.2010.4282.1

References

Simon Anders, Wolfgang Huber (2010). “Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.” Nature Precedings, 1–1.

Examples

yeast_psrn <- psrn(yeast, "identifier")
yeast_psrn_with_load <- psrn(yeast, "identifier", load_info = TRUE)
yeast_ng50_only <- psrn(yeast, "identifier", target = matches('ng50'))

Description

A dataset containing quantification of peptides using Progenesis. True positives peptides spiked-in from the Universal Proteomics Standard Set 1 (UPS1) at three different concentrations and true negatives from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with the same concentration in all samples. You can find true positives with stringr::str_detect(ups$identifier, 'UPS'). For details see Berg et al. (2019) and if you use this dataset please cite the same paper.

Usage

ups

Format

A data frame with 10599 rows and 13 variables:

identifier

id column for features, true positives contains UPS and true negatives contains Cre

fmol25_1,fmol25_2,fmol25_3,fmol25_4

Technical replicates with true positives spiked-in from 25 fmol UPS1 peptides

fmol50_1,fmol50_2,fmol50_3,fmol50_4

Technical replicate with true positives spiked-in from 50 fmol UPS1 peptides

fmol100_1,fmol100_2,fmol100_3,fmol100_4

Technical replicate with true positives spiked-in from 100 fmol UPS1 peptides

Source

https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-019-2619-6

References

Philip Berg, Evan W McConnell, Leslie M Hicks, Sorina C Popescu, George V Popescu (2019). “Evaluation of linear models and missing value imputation for the analysis of peptide-centric proteomics.” BMC bioinformatics, 20(2), 7–16.

Description

Here we will model the mean of the prior with a weakly informative (WI) prior. We will assume that, in essence, nothing is know about the mean. As such, for the WI prior, we use a normal prior on $\boldsymbol{\mu}_0$ centered at zero and with a very large variance.

$\boldsymbol{\mu}_0\sim\mathcal{N}(0,100)$

Value

A stanmodel that can be used in infer_data_and_decision_model.

Code

The Stan code for this model is given by:

weakly_informative
S4 class stanmodel 'weakly_informative' coded as follows:
data {
  int<lower=0> N;     // number of data items
  int<lower=0> K;     // number of conditions
  int C;              // number of comparisons to perform
  matrix[N, K] x;     // design matrix
  vector[N] y;        // data
  matrix[K, C] c;     // contrast matrix
  real alpha;         // alpha prior for gamma
  real beta;          // beta prior for gamma
  vector[N] u;        // uncertainty
}
transformed data{
  vector[K] n_k;      // per condition measurements
  row_vector[C] n_c;  // per comparison measurements
  matrix[K, C] abs_c; // abs of C for n_c calculation
  for (i in 1:K) {
    for (j in 1:C) {
      abs_c[i, j] = abs(c[i, j]);
    }
  }
  for (i in 1:K) {
    n_k[i] = 1/sum(x[,i]);
  }
  n_c = n_k' * abs_c;
  n_c = sqrt(n_c);
}
parameters {
  vector[K] mu;           // coefficients for predictors
  real<lower=0> sigma;    // error scale
  array[C] real y_diff;   // difference in coefficients
  vector[K] eta;          // Error in mean
  vector[K] prior_mu_not; // Estimation error
}
transformed parameters{
  row_vector[C] mu_diff = mu' * c;        // differences in means
  vector[C] sigma_lfc = sigma * n_c';     // variance of y_diff
}
model {
  sigma        ~ gamma(alpha, beta);                      // variance
  eta          ~ normal(0, 1);                            // NCP auxilary variable
  prior_mu_not ~ normal(0, 10);                           // prior mean
  mu           ~ normal(prior_mu_not + sigma*eta, sigma); // mean
  y            ~ normal(x * mu, sigma*u);                 // data model
  y_diff       ~ normal(mu_diff, sigma_lfc);              // difference statistic
} 

Description

A dataset containing quantification of reversibly oxidized cysteines using Progenesis. True positives cysteines spiked-in from yeast at two different concentrations and true negatives from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with the same concentration in all samples. To identify true positives one can use stringr::str_detect(yeast$identifier, 'YEAST'). For details see Berg et al. (2019) and if you use this dataset please cite the same paper.

Usage

yeast

Format

A data frame with 2235 rows and 7 variables:

identifier

id column for features, true positives contains YEAST and true negatives contains Cre

ng50_1,ng50_2,ng50_3

Biological replicates with true positives spiked-in from 50 ng yeast cells

ng100_1,ng100_2,ng100_3

Biological replicates with true positives spiked-in from 100 ng yeast cells

Source

https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-019-2619-6

References

Philip Berg, Evan W McConnell, Leslie M Hicks, Sorina C Popescu, George V Popescu (2019). “Evaluation of linear models and missing value imputation for the analysis of peptide-centric proteomics.” BMC bioinformatics, 20(2), 7–16.